News

Jeremy Hunt urges economic watchdog to prevent Chancellor Rachel Reeves ‘fiddling the fiscal rules’ _ Hieuuk

Jeremy Hunt last night called for Britain’s economic watchdog to prevent Labour ‘fiddling the fiscal rules’.

The former chancellor will table a Commons amendment today which would require the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) to assess the impact of any move by Rachel Reeves to change the fiscal rules covering government spending and borrowing.

Ms Reeves has adopted similar rules to the previous Tory government, including measures that require the national debt to be falling as a share of income in five years’ time.

symbol
00:03
02:24
Read More

 

But in recent weeks she has ducked question about whether she will change the definition used for debt – a move which could allow her to borrow billions more.

Mr Hunt, the Shadow Chancellor, said: ‘If Labour fails to back this amendment it will confirm that the Chancellor is planning to fiddle the fiscal rules leading to a massive increase in borrowing and debt with hard working taxpayers left to pick up the tab.

Jeremy Hunt (Pictured sitting in the House of Commons) has called for Britain¿s economic watchdog to stop Labour ¿fiddling the fiscal rules

+5
View gallery

Jeremy Hunt (Pictured sitting in the House of Commons) has called for Britain’s economic watchdog to stop Labour ‘fiddling the fiscal rules

Ms Reeves (Pictured addressing a press conference at the Treasury) - the current Chancellor has taken on board similar rules to government spending and borrowing as the previous Tory government

+5
View gallery

Ms Reeves (Pictured addressing a press conference at the Treasury) – the current Chancellor has taken on board similar rules to government spending and borrowing as the previous Tory government

Jeremy Hunt grills Rachel Reeves over alleged ‘cronyism’

‘As with their plans to raise taxes, these are changes they planned right from the beginning, but simply did not have the courage to tell the British public about during the election.’

Read More

Labour is accused of ‘picking the pockets of pensioners’ with winter fuel plans

article image

Ms Reeves will today bring forward the Budget Responsibility Bill, which will require the government to get an OBR assessment of any tax package totalling more than one per cent of GDP.

The Chancellor said it was needed to prevent a repeat of Liz Truss’s infamous mini-Budget in 2022, which spooked the markets by pushing through £50 billion of tax cuts without an OBR assessment of whether they could be afforded.

But Mr Hunt said changing the fiscal rules could have a similar impact on borrowing – and should be subject to a similar assessment.

He told the Mail: ‘If you’re going to claim the mantle of responsibility, surely that applies to changes to fiscal rules, which would allow you to increase borrowing massively.

However in recent weeks she has dodged questions surrounding if she was going to change the definition (Pictured: Rachel Reeves visiting a housing development site in Liverpool)

+5
View gallery

However in recent weeks she has dodged questions surrounding if she was going to change the definition (Pictured: Rachel Reeves visiting a housing development site in Liverpool)

This change in definition would allow for her  to borrow billions more (Pictured: A person holding up a wad of British pound notes)

+5
View gallery

This change in definition would allow for her  to borrow billions more (Pictured: A person holding up a wad of British pound notes)

‘They have already picked the pockets of pensioners completely against their manifesto commitment by withdrawing the winter fuel payment.

‘But if they were to pay for the public sector, pay awards by increasing borrowing by £10 billion a year, which is what many people think they would do, they would also be picking the pockets of the young, because it would be the young who would have to pay the price in higher interest payments, higher debt repayments. for generations ahead.

‘That just goes to prove the age old adage that there are no winners under a Labour government, old, young, rich, poor, middle class, working class, everyone ends up paying more.

‘And it would be the most cynical thing, because it would be a sign of tax on future generations.’

LEAVE A RESPONSE

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *