• News

    Bam! Angela Rayner’s big mouth has cost the UK £1bn, just like that_l

    Lang Posted on

    It’s great being in opposition, you can come out with all sorts of guff. Being in government is a different thing, though, as deputy PM Angela Rayner has just discovered.

    Rayner-mouth-billion

    Angela Rayna should have been more circumspect when discussing P&O’s employment practices (Image: Getty)

    Too many in the Labour party are keen on striking poses that will please the trade unions and party faithful, and they don’t seem to care about the consequences. Angela Rayner is right at the top of that list. She takes pride in being “mouthy”.

    That’s how she got into politics in the first place. While a care worker she was made union rep because in her own words: “I was mouthy and would take no messing from management.”

    Frankly, if I was in the same union as Angela Rayner, I’d vote for her to be my union rep, too. Stick it to the management and all that.

    She’d be brilliant at it.

    Unfortunately, sticking it to the management isn’t such a good pose to strike, when you are the bloomin’ management. In case nobody told her, she’s helping her boss Keir Starmer run the country.

    Rabble rousing statements designed to work the party faithful into a froth of anti-capitalist anger can have brutal consequences when other people catch wind of them.

    Mouthy Rayner has just lost the UK a cool £1billion in much-needed overseas investment into the UK economy.

    There’s a cost to allowing her to stomp around saying what she wants, and other people are paying for it in their jobs.

     

    I bet Rayner and transport secretary Louise Haigh felt like they were sticking it to the man when they described ferries company P&O as “unscrupulous” and “exploitative” this week.

    They singled out the company while vowing to close a “legal loophole” that P&O allegedly sued to sack almost 800 workers in 2022.

    I bet the unions loved it.

    And you know what, I’m sure they had a point. A whole heap of big businesses don’t treat their workers like they should.

    There’s nothing wrong in protesting about that.

    But when you’re in government, you have to handle things a bit more delicately. For example, by introducing laws in Parliament, not hurling targeted abuse at alleged offenders, which is what Rayner and Haigh have just done.

    I’m sure they feel proud of sticking to their left-wing principles. But the result is that Labour has just inflicted even more needless economic damage on the country.

    P&O owner DP World has just put a planned £1billion expansion of one of Britain’s biggest container hubs on hold after Rayner’s attack.

    It’s even more embarrassing than that.

     

    By happy coincidence, PM Keir Starmer is making a big push to boost overseas investment to the UK, convening a summit next week.

    DP World had been planning to announce its investment in London Gateway port at this very summit.

    Now there will be no announcement. The planned investment is “under review”, according to Bloomberg news. DP World chief Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem won’t even be attending Starmer’s summit.

    Good work, Angela. I bet your boss is thrilled.

    The UK desperately needs to encourage investment and growth. Its Budget attack on higher earners has already scared enough people away from the UK.

    Is Labour now planning to insult the businesses who are still investing here, one by one?

    Sir Keir is desperate to reposition the UK as a country that is open for business to boost overseas investment. That task would be easier if he could ask Angela Rayner to think before she opens her mouth.

    LEAVE A RESPONSE

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Lang
    View all posts

    You Might Also Like

    News

    Cabinet ministers were branded ‘hypocrites’ last night for claiming soaring amounts on expenses to heat their second homes while stripping ten million pensioners of their winter fuel payments. Eleven of Sir Keir Starmer‘s Cabinet have relied on taxpayer-funded help to pay their energy bills, analysis of expenses receipts reveals, with the amount they claimed soaring by 75 per cent over three years. Critics last night said it ‘wasn’t a good look’ amid warnings that hundreds of thousands of pensioners will be forced to choose between ‘heating or eating’ because of Labour’s overhaul. Among the claimants was Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who announced last month that she was axing cold-weather payments for millions. She said it was necessary to help plug a £22 billion ‘black hole’ in the public finances she claims was left behind by the Tories. Eleven of Sir Keir Starmer ‘s Cabinet have relied on taxpayer-funded help to pay their energy bills, analysis of expenses receipts reveals. Pictured: Figures of six top Labour ministers Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s cabinet pose for a photo with Volodymyr Zelenskyy last month Critics last night said it ‘wasn’t a good look’ amid warnings that hundreds of thousands of pensioners will be forced to choose between ‘heating or eating’ because of Labour’s overhaul to winter fuel payments (stock image) But nearly half of this sum relates to inflation-busting pay hikes the new administration has offered to public sector workers, sparking accusations that they’re ‘robbing’ the elderly to appease their union baron ‘paymasters’. In 2021-22, Ms Reeves claimed £382 for help towards paying the energy bills at her second home. This shot up to £1,186 last year. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, whose department is responsible for denying elderly people the fuel payments, claimed £1,284 towards her energy bills in 2021-22, and £2,400 last year. Energy Secretary Ed Milliband’s claims also shot up from £650 to £1,100, while Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson’s surged from £1,052 to £1,896. In total, the 11 Cabinet ministers claimed £7,187 towards their gas and electricity bills in 2021-22, which soared to £12,620 for the first three-quarters of last year. Baroness Altmann, a former pensions minister in David Cameron’s government, said: ‘It makes you want to weep. It almost beggars belief that ministers don’t seem to realise how many millions of people in this country who are elderly are struggling to make ends meet. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, whose department is responsible for denying elderly people the fuel payments, claimed £1,284 towards her energy bills in 2021-22, and £2,400 last year Energy Secretary Ed Milliband’s claims also shot up from £650 to £1,100, while Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson’s surged from £1,052 to £1,896 Baroness Altmann, a former pensions minister in David Cameron’s government, said: ‘It makes you want to weep’ Dennis Reed, director of pensioners’ campaign group Silver Voices, said: ‘It’s rather sad and hypocritical’ ‘When they see the kinds of figures the Government says it can afford [in public sector pay rises], it will upset a lot of pensioners and make them very angry.’ Dennis Reed, director of pensioners’ campaign group Silver Voices, said: ‘It’s rather sad and hypocritical. ‘And I hope that, when Rachel Reeves and Liz Kendall and the others come to consider whether they should continue this very cruel policy, they come to realise that this is not a good look. ‘I’m afraid it feeds into the narrative that there’s one rule for those at the top of society and another rule for the rest of us, and particularly those at the bottom end of the income scale.’ The claims relate to money that MPs, whose salaries rose to £91,346 this year, are entitled to receive for having to work from two locations if their constituency is not in London. They can claim money towards the cost of having a property near Westminster, including council tax and utilities. Tory energy spokesman Claire Coutinho said: ‘The Chancellor has made a choice to axe winter fuel payments for vulnerable pensioners whilst delivering inflation-busting pay rises demanded by her union paymasters and refusing to clamp down on the welfare bill’ There is no suggestion that those who have made claims have broken any rules. It came amid reports yesterday that Ms Reeves is refusing to publish a report into the impact of scrapping the winter payments. Impact assessments are routinely published when governments cut benefits, but Ms Reeves is ruling out releasing the findings – or even confirming if or when an investigation was carried out, the Sunday Express reported. Tory energy spokesman Claire Coutinho said: ‘The Chancellor has made a choice to axe winter fuel payments for vulnerable pensioners whilst delivering inflation-busting pay rises demanded by her union paymasters and refusing to clamp down on the welfare bill.’ She demanded that Ms Reeves ‘come clean’ and admit exactly how many pensioners will suffer. Tory MP Dr Caroline Johnson added: ‘Cold homes are associated with excess winter deaths. The pension credit thresholds are low. If elderly people cannot afford to heat their homes they are at increased risk of becoming ill.’ Pensioners face more misery after experts at the Cornwall Insight consultancy said they believe energy bills will jump by as much as £150 this winter. They think the energy price cap will be hiked by as much as 10 per cent, from the current level of £1,568 for a ‘typical’ household, when the regulator Ofgem reviews it this week. Adam Scorer, boss of fuel poverty charity National Energy Action, said: ‘If these alarming estimates are confirmed by Ofgem on Friday, energy bills and energy debt will stretch household finances beyond breaking point.’ A Labour spokesman said: ‘The accommodation costs budget is designed to meet costs incurred by MPs as a result of working from two permanent locations. MPs of all parties are entitled to this, and they continue paying their utility bills for their own homes like everyone else.’H

    hai hai